Dissertation Editing Center · NYC · NJ · CTOrder a review →
Dissertation Editing Center
Vol. I · No. XEnterprise & university solutions

A scholarly review department for every program.

Universities deploy us the way they deploy a writing centre: as durable institutional capacity, configured for your programs, retention policies, and governance. SOC 2 Type II in progress, FERPA-aware, DPAs available.

Book a 20-min demo →Download institutional brief (PDF) →
Reading room of a contemporary academic library with tall windows and rows of desks.
Reading room of a contemporary academic library with tall windows and rows of desks.Photograph · Iñaki del Olmo — Unsplash
Candidates from programs at
ColumbiaNYURutgersPrincetonYaleFordhamCUNY Graduate CenterTeachers CollegeUConn

Individual doctoral candidates from these programs have engaged with the platform. For institutional pilot inquiries, see the case study and demo booking below.

Institution-wide deployment

Roll out Scholaria to a program, cohort, or entire institution with central provisioning.

SSO, SCIM, and policy

Enterprise SSO (SAML/OIDC), SCIM provisioning, and policy controls that match how universities operate.

FERPA-aware controls

Retention, residency, and access policies configured per program. Detailed audit trail.

Program analytics

Submission readiness over time, by program, by cohort. Identify writing-center load and learning gaps.

Branded deliverables

Reports rendered with your institution's branding, voice, and writing-center workflow.

Concierge program lead

A dedicated program lead works with your writing center, graduate school, or research office.

Pilot programs

Designed to be deployed in a single term.

  1. Week 1

    Onboarding & SSO

    Identity, retention policy, and branding configured with your IT and writing-center leads.

  2. Weeks 2–6

    Pilot cohort

    Two to three programs deploy the platform to active doctoral and graduate cohorts.

  3. Weeks 7–12

    Institutional review

    Program analytics, submission readiness lift, and writing-center load reported back to your office.

Pilot outcomes

One R1 graduate school of education, one term, one cohort.

Cohort size
47
active Ed.D. candidates in Year 2–3
Baseline readiness
58
median committee-readiness self-score, pre-pilot
Post-pilot readiness
76
median committee-readiness self-score, end of term
"We were skeptical going in. By week eight, candidates were using the readiness scores to structure chair meetings. Three of four committee chairs requested access to read the audit logs alongside the drafts."

— Program director, Mid-Atlantic R1 R2 Ed.D. program (anonymized per pilot agreement)

Book a demo

20-minute demo with a program lead.

We'll walk through a real chapter review end-to-end, the institutional pilot template, DPA/BAA templates, SCIM provisioning, and pricing for your cohort size. Bring your IT lead and your writing-center director if you can.

Request

Suggest three time windows. We'll confirm by reply.

Replies arrive within one business hour during operating hours (Mon–Fri 9am–7pm ET).

Institutional brief PDFDPA templateSecurity & privacy